Political Letters Galore

Posted in: Sandwich News
Nov 4, 2008 - 9:31:42 AM

Digg this story!
Email this article
Printer friendly page

This year, The Enterprise received so many Letters to the Editor concerning next week’s election that it was impossible to print them all in the paper. What follows are some of those letters that did not appear in print. While these letters did not make “the cut” for the print edition, the authors’ opinions are worth consideration.

Disappointed By Editorial

I was very disappointed to read your recent editorial (10/31/08) heaping praise on a man we know relatively little about. Oh yes, he “spoke” at the DNC and gave a rousing speech to the nation a few years back and since has been touted as the savior.
Come on, do you really think this guy has the necessary qualifications to become the president of the US? He gives rhetorical speeches and attracts crowds wherever he speaks, but does this qualify him as a knowledgeable person? Look beyond the hype and scratch the surface. Here is a guy who has questionable associations with individuals and groups and is being bankrolled by the unknown. How can one person raise almost $700 million to be elected and we are to believe it is all with small untraceable donations.
His political approach to solutions is through taxation and trickle down/welfare distribution of wealth. He is about to, when elected, reach into all of our pockets and “redistribute” wealth to those in need. This becomes socialism at its best and places us as a society on a path of ruin. One term in office with him and the rest of the liberal agenda is going to destroy the fabric of American freedoms. Here is a man who has said on record that he will sit down with the terrorist leaders with no strings attached. Wonderful, that says a lot about his knowledge and ability to comprehend. We are also looking at a man whom you define as a “gifted orator and politician”— again, these are really defining qualities for a person to lead our country. You must be kidding.
I believe that his track record speaks volumes of what we are about to be faced with and endure for at least four years, if elected. His insatiable appetite for taxation is already on record, his slip of the tongue regarding redistribution of wealth is on record, sitting down with terrorist leaders is on record, his political and personal association with radical organizers is on record, and, lastly, his lack of candor when faced with the difficult questions is also available. This person has never been candid about how he became so rich overnight and how he has prospered under the same rules he now wants to change.
I am not so hard of heart to realize that “help” sometimes has to be provided to those who really need it. But to think that it is perfectly alright to reach into my pocket to take my hard-earned money and have someone else determine where it is to go is unacceptable. I worked two, sometimes three jobs, and went to school nights in order to give my family a home and good life and expected that when I got older that I would be able to hold onto what I have earned.
Now for someone to come along and tell me that we are going to take some of your wealth and to give it to others who need it does not sit well with me and others. For true change in this country to happen we must look at what got us here and continues to keep us here, and that is the ongoing hacks regaining their hold on political office. Why not champion term limits in one of your editorials…

Richard W. Nugent
Blacksmith Shop Road
East Falmouth

About Obama Endorsement

In my nine years as an Enterprise subscriber I have never seen such a long and adulatory editorial column. Senator Obama is indeed highly educated, extremely articulate, and comfortable in addressing any audience. His campaign has been professional and well-organized, which I regret cannot be said for his opposition. By the time you go to press he will be our President-elect; the most liberal state in the union will have contributed to the election of the most liberal member of the Senate—not exactly a pretty picture in my view. Senator Obama commands respect, but he is not a Jack Kennedy or the embodiment of the second coming.
It is very difficult to sort out the elements of each candidate’s proposed approach to rectifying the economy. For this reason I rely upon Steve Forbes, chairman of the respected magazine which bears his surname, for his views on matters of the national economy and fiscal policy, rather than the mainstream media whose bias and agenda are well known. Hopefully the rantings of the iconoclastic Hollywood elite have had a minor influence on the voting public.
The introduction to the book entitled, Getting America Right contains the following sentence (almost verbatim). “With a civil tone and respectful criticism, the authors show how far this country has moved from the core values and guiding principles that underly the founding of this country.” It strikes me that the words “civil” and “respectful” have eluded a great deal of the opinions expressed in this campaign.
Good luck to us all.

Bradford S. Barnes
Cairn Ridge Road
East Falmouth

Thoughts On Question 1

Question 1 proposes phasing out the state income tax over the next few years. “The sky will fall,” the governor shouts. “Taxes will go down,” proponents say. Which is true? Neither.
As somebody originally from “tax-free” New Hampshire, I have a unique perspective into life in an income tax-free state. In addition to no income tax for earned wages, New Hampshire also has no sales tax. New Hampshire taxes corporations, unearned income (such as capital gains), and its fees are similar to Massachusetts. Politicians close corporate tax loopholes, which allow companies to evade paying their fair share. Overall tax burden is lower, but there are tradeoffs people should be aware of when deciding whether to support Question 1.
Property taxes are higher because school funding comes from the town, not “state aid.” A percentage of property taxes (2.3 percent) help schools in poorer towns. County taxes are similar to Massachusetts. Unlike Cape towns, where 100 percent of income taxes go to the state but less than 40 percent comes back in the form of state aid, 95 percent of tax revenues stay in town. If you pay $3,000 property tax on a $250,000 home in Massachusetts, you might pay $4,500 in New Hampshire. However, because you are not taxed on income, a $50,000/year wage earner saves $2,500/year. The taxpayer comes out ahead $1,000.
Motor vehicle taxes are also higher. If you pay $100 per year for excise taxes in Massachusetts, you pay a $140 “road use fee” in New Hampshire. Road taxes are dedicated to maintaining state-owned roads and the state police who patrol them. Despite enormous annual snowfall, roads, and bridges are meticulously maintained because road use fees are not siphoned away for other purposes. Deduct $40 from your remaining $1,000 and the taxpayer still comes out ahead $960.
Town Meeting is a festive occasion. Because voters can compute a direct correlation between budget items and their tax bill, attendance is high, and voters vigorously debate the merits of proposed expenditures. Repaint town hall…yes. Buy the police chief an ATV so he can patrol the rail trail…no. Expand the town health offices by four hours per week so more residents can get flu shots…yes.
At this point, someone will stand up and remind voters that although none of these items is a huge tax increase, overall the small increases add up. Hire a new teacher, yes. Build an addition onto town hall, so the clerk has her own office…not this year. When it is your money and not some phantom “state aid” drawn from an ethereal pool of other people’s money, voters become very fiscally conservative.
Voters in poorly managed towns complain New Hampshire should institute a state income tax to take money away from fiscally sound towns. However, troubled towns are usually towns that make imprudent capital improvements (such as building a new school and fire station the same year) or give “pork” tax breaks to businesses. Savvy voters are skeptical when businesses request tax breaks and demand data to back up promises of economic benefit because it is townsfolk who directly bear the consequences. It’s harder to bamboozle an entire town of taxpayers than line the pockets of a Machiavellian politician.
Overall, the tax burden is slightly lower in New Hampshire. This is what I expect would happen in Massachusetts if Question 1 passes. Government becomes smaller and more responsive to the people. If you have to bite the financial bullet, you are given an explanation and a voice about the best way to solve the problem. New Hampshire taxpayers have a lot more control because they (not politicians or lobbyists) control the purse strings.
Massachusetts politicians have been unresponsive to the people for quite some time. To frighten us into compliance, they make budget cuts to popular programs two weeks before the election. If Question 1 passes, a period of scrambling to fund worthy programs by raising property taxes at the local level will be followed by a period of eliminating pork giveaways to big business and special interest groups by the state. Taxpayers will pay higher property taxes with tax savings from their paycheck or social security check. The average taxpayer will win, not because he sees a large decrease in his tax burden, but because he regains control over how his money is spent.

Anna T. Burroughs-Merrill
Boulder Brook Road
East Sandwich

Dismayed By Sign Theft

Since the beginning of our residency in Sandwich in 1991, the Susko Family has always displayed political candidate signs in the spring and fall in support of our local, state, and federal candidates and they have never been vandalized or removed. Even the year we supported Ross Perot for President.
Thus, we were rather surprised and dismayed to discover that our McCain/Palin sign was recently stolen from our front yard, as was our neighbor’s. A quick survey of the other candidate’s signs in the neighborhood revealed theirs to be intact.
It’s unfortunate and sad, but no big deal. Whoever was responsible is welcome to our one sign. We will have the last laugh when we cast our votes on Election Day. That’s five votes, with one coming via absentee ballot from Iraq.
Go ahead and try to take that away!

The Susko Family
Greenville Drive
Forestdale

Sees Editor As ‘Enemy’

My first reaction to your editorial was that I had reached the limits of the political pablum foisted upon your readers on a weekly basis. I contemplated the disgusted reader option of demanding that you cancel my subscription. However being retired military (23 years retired reserve) I recognized that I would not be able to maintain my ability to recon the enemy. Yes, Mr. Editor, I see you as an enemy to our constitutional republic with regard to this editorial.
If you would like to know my specific objections to your editorial, just reverse the gist of your column, that will work fine. I would hope true Democrats would reject Obama’s comparison to JFK. He’s not even close with regard to experience and gravitas. George W. Bush has been the biggest disappointment of my adult life. (McCain is not Bush.) Obama may be the biggest empty suit ever to be foisted upon the American electorate. He has never run a Dunkin’ Donuts, let alone met any sort of payroll or made any profit and loss decisions. The man is a self-avowed socialist, colleague, and disciple of domestic terrorists and racists (you could look it up, as Casey would say) and by the time this may be published, may be soon to be the “commander in chief” of our military without any, none, nada, experience.
I was told long ago that we get the government we deserve. God help the USA if we deserve Obama.

James F. Gallagher
West Crossfield Road
Forestdale

Thanks For Support

I want to thank the local media for their coverage of this election season and for the thousands of voters I have met during my campaign for reelection as state representative. It is clear from speaking to the voters while going door to door and on the telephone that the economy and government overspending is foremost on your minds.
I believe elected officials at all levels need to do a better job at thinking about those taxpayers who are struggling to make ends meet. Taxpayers need relief from the growing costs of government. I am proud of my record of standing up and saying “no” when government attempts to improperly spend your money.
Until we see more fiscal restraint we are unlikely to have the financial resources to address the appropriate roles of government such as education, public safety, transportation, and care for those who cannot care for themselves.
The disconnection I see in state government is that each time we expend funds for a wasteful or unnecessary program or inappropriate earmark, it reduces our ability to deliver core services to those really in need. We can do better, and yes, we need change. I ask for your support so I can continue to fight for positive change on Beacon Hill.
Finally, I want you to know that I sincerely appreciate the opportunity to serve in the Massachusetts House of Representatives. Please feel free to personally contact me should I be able to assist you or you wish to express your views on an issue facing your state government. I ask for your vote again on November 4.

Jeffrey Davis Perry
State Representative
Fifth Barnstable District

Urges No To Question 2

On November 4, Massachusetts voters will be asked to choose whether they want our state, our communities, and our families to be the testing ground for what The Economist magazine has called the most radical marijuana ballot initiative in the country.
Voters will choose between our current laws or the radical agenda of national marijuana proponents, whose end goal is legalization of the drug. Voters will choose between a steadily declining rate of marijuana use among teenagers in Massachusetts or sending the message to our young people that drug use is safe and acceptable.
Passage of Question 2 will decriminalize marijuana use and turn possession of an ounce or less of marijuana into a fine similar to one you’d get for a traffic violation. And for kids under the age of 21, the penalties for marijuana possession will be reduced well below current penalties for alcohol possession. Drug use and abuse will increase among children and adults. And Massachusetts communities and families—not the well-heeled, out-of-state proponents of Question 2—will be left to deal with the consequences.
Despite the best efforts of Question 2 backers to paint marijuana as harmless, the facts are clear.
Kids who smoke marijuana are more likely to do poorly in school, more likely to require counseling, more likely to engage in violence and—perhaps most importantly—are more likely to get behind the wheel of a car high on marijuana. According to MADD, 41 percent of teens are not concerned about driving high on marijuana—a shocking number considering drivers who’ve smoked pot are 10 times more likely to be injured, or to injure others, in automobile crashes. Marijuana is more carcinogenic than tobacco and is a major factor in juvenile hospital admissions. To use marijuana, children have to buy it—putting themselves at enormous risk.
Call Question 2 the drug dealer protection act. Why? Question 2 will enable and embolden drug dealers and allow them to carry up to an ounce of marijuana without the threat of criminal prosecution. Despite the best efforts of proponents to paint an ounce of marijuana as something too small to be worth the attention of the police and courts, the fact is that one ounce of marijuana is worth from $400 to $600 and represents about 60 individual sales. And where does that ounce come from? It comes from the pounds of marijuana that traffickers will bring here and cut up in our neighborhoods, once there is no downside to retailing the drug.
Question 2s supporters argue that existing laws unfairly and harshly punish those who have been caught with an ounce or less of marijuana.
But it simply isn’t true.
In Suffolk and Middlesex counties last year not one person went to jail for a first-time marijuana offense alone. Of the 371 marijuana convictions in Suffolk County last year 18 of those ended with a jail sentence. And those sentences weren’t handed down for marijuana possession—they were handed down for the crimes that so often accompany marijuana on the streets of our cities: armed robbery, assault, rape, or burglary.
Statewide, according to the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association, the numbers are similar: of the 174 people sent to jail in 2006 for marijuana, there was not one case where that possession charge was a first offense. Instead, those sentenced to prison were guilty of prior convictions, had violated parole or probation, or were convicted in tandem with another, more serious crime
As for simple possession: Carrying an ounce or less of marijuana in Massachusetts means probation for six months. If you don’t get arrested again during that period, the criminal record is wiped clean and the CORI record is sealed and inactive. Those are the facts.
What about claims that our current drug laws are unfairly limiting access to student loans for first-time offenders? Again, not true. Only a conviction leads to a temporary one-year suspension of federal loans. And in Massachusetts judges and prosecutors are required to place first-time offenders on probation and wipe their records clean after six months.
Passage of Question 2 will come at an incredible social and economic cost to all of us. Drug use will cost America $258 billion just this year. Here in Massachusetts, we can count on increased health costs, traffic injuries and fatalities, increased law enforcement costs, lost productivity, lowered workplace safety, and the heavy toll of addiction on communities and families.
Please join me in voting no on Question 2.

Michael O’Keefe
District Attorney
Cape & Islands District
Barnstable

Feels McCain Is Best

Back in 1994 when the Republicans swept both the House and Senate from the Democrats, the late Peter Jennings of ABC News exclaimed that “the voters have thrown a tantrum.” No, Peter, I think that they had enough of the Washington crowd and their inability to look out for the American people, which is why to this casual observer, the 2008 elections seem like such a paradox.
On the one hand we have an unpopular Republican president filling out the final days of his term and, on the other hand, an unpopular Democrat-controlled Congress, which has historically low approval ratings never seen before in the modern era. Despite this anomaly, the polls indicate that not only may the most inexperienced and unqualified candidate for President of the United States get elected, but more Democrats may be added to the most unproductive and ineffective Congress in history. So, maybe, instead of throwing a tantrum the voters are simply forgetting to take their meds.
While out of the country recently, I was able to read some foreign news sources and listen to Europeans engaged in political conversation. I was shocked to find that despite Obama’s European love fest that we witnessed last summer, the attitude was mostly cool toward His Excellency Barack. In a nutshell they are disappointed in both the government bailout and the American people’s willingness to elect an admitted Socialist in an attempt to improve their economic situation.
The Europeans have had firsthand experience with the failings of big government and large expensive social programs, which is why they have seen a conservative shift in their home countries. Despite what Americans may hear in the mainstream media, the United States is still fairly well respected around the world. You need to look no further than the nuclear issue with Iran to realize that despite the effort by the Europeans over the last several years, nothing of substance has been accomplished that will reduce the chance of a nuclear-armed terrorist state. Our friends across the pond are fully aware that it will take serious US intervention to resolve the issue, and, if a President Obama comes to pass, the chances of that happening are less than zero.
For those of you whom are planning on voting or perhaps still considering voting for BHO, stop and consider this one frightening thought. Secretary of State John F. Kerry. With that bit of information floating around it should be game, set, and match for Senator McCain and by a landslide. Senator Kerry is currently seeking his fifth term as a US senator but after 24 years in office this gigolo hall of famer is best known for cutting in line and marrying rich women. Can you imagine this indecisive jellyfish staring down the leaders of Iran, Russia and Syria, just to name a few? How would he squeeze in all that travel time between windsurfing excursions?
I have to admit that getting rid of John Kerry would be a big plus for the people of Massachusetts that every six years he claims to represent. But, remember, we can’t think like that. It’s country first.

James J. Killion
Pierre Vernier Drive
Sandwich

Mr. Perry Is ‘Trustworthy’

I met Representative Jeff Perry a few years back at a Fair Share for Sandwich meeting. Before being elected into office he took the time to visit parents, seniors, public workers, and other groups to familiarize himself about the concerns of the people in his community. Once elected he vigorously began to advocate for our local needs and has done an excellent job.
During our many trips to the State House Representative Perry was able to arrange for Fair Share advocates, who included parents and community leaders, to meet with many key people about the inequities in school funding, which placed Sandwich at around third from the bottom of all Massachusetts communities in terms of how many dollars per student were received. At the time, while most communities received 30 to 50 percent of their overall school funding from the state, and some as much as 80 percent or higher, Sandwich received less than 20 percent.
Representative Perry has been working tirelessly to expose and correct the issue of inequitable distribution of local aid and educational funding, earning his way onto both the Education and House Ways and Means committees. These are not positions that a rookie leader can step into. We need Representative Perry to stay where he is to continue the job he has so successfully been doing, including increasing state aid to education in the district by 30 percent.
Additionally, Representative Perry plans to continue his work to expand Jessica’s Law to provide stricter sentencing for sex offenders and protection for our children. He promotes responsible spending, lower taxes, and cutting wasteful spending on special interests and fringes while protecting local aid. He is committed to preserving family values, supports our troops, and believes in denying access to public funds to those who are here illegally. These are the reasons that he gets my vote.
It is difficult these days to have faith in our government, following political campaigns and watching our savings dwindle because of the economic crisis politicians have helped to create, but I can honestly say that it has been a privilege getting to know Jeff Perry and his wife, Lisa, through community activities. I feel from my own experience and from conversations with others who have interacted with him over their own concerns that he is approachable and trustworthy and I hope you will join me in voting to re-elect him on Tuesday.

Diane V. Splitz
Nauset Street
Sandwich

Perry Supports Military Families

As an unenrolled voter I do not want any party candidate taking my vote for granted. From watching the way Representative Jeff Perry campaigns, it is certain he never “expected” my vote but worked for it.
My first encounter with Jeff was when my son returned home from Army Airborne jump school and I introduced my son to him. I realized soon enough that I was the odd man out as the two discussed their Army service. Jeff Perry has since proven to me that he did not take that encounter for granted: by spending a few minutes with the son, I’ll get the dad’s vote. We went on our way and time passed.
After my son was deployed to Afghanistan we received an envelope from Jeff with a recent article about my son cut out from a local paper and laminated on a homemade frame, along with a letter thanking my son for his service. Some are thinking—what’s the big deal? As parents of deployed children know, it is a very big deal.
I didn’t really know Jeff Perry before that but have since found him to be very engaged on a personal level with what is happening in the lives of our soldiers and their families.
Jeff Perry has consistently supported our troops by supporting the state’s Welcome Home legislation, organizing support the troop events and personally helping veterans gain the benefits they deserve.
I have seen him at many Support the Troops rallys, big or small, and supporting local groups that send care packages to our troops and never looking for the photo op when doing so. Easily stepping aside to let our troops take the spotlight.
Jeff Perry has a clear understanding of how the military works and what military families are going through, as a past member of the Army National Guard. Jeff makes every effort to put the needs of our servicemen/women who are serving our nation under extreme conditions a priority, and for that reason I am voting for Jeff Perry.

Thomas B. Lynch
Betty Avenue
Sandwich

Urges Vote For Turkington

The Republican candidate for Register of Probate, Anastasia Welch Perrino, has claimed her position at the registry as assistant register makes her qualified for the post of register.
It was repeatedly pointed out during the Republican primary that her position at the time she left was not assistant register, but assistant judicial case manager. Yet she continues to claim the former title in her statements and advertisements.
If we can’t believe what she says about herself, why should we believe what she says about her opponent?
Her claim that Eric Turkington would add two positions, including an ombudsman, to the office is a another stretch, since Turkington has repeatedly said that, in view of the state’s fiscal situation, adding any new staff is out of the question.
He does say that the current staff should be reorganized to give priority to the flood of new people without lawyers that the upcoming hard times will bring to the Probate Court, while at the Falmouth LWV forum last week Ms. Perrino indicated that she thought the court was already doing enough for those people.
If you want more business as usual at the Probate Court, elect Ms. Perrino. If you want a new set of eyes, fresh ideas, and a name you can trust to make the courts work for all of us, vote for Eric Turkington.

James E. Mahoney
Race Lane
Sandwich

Perry ‘A Straight Shooter’

I write this letter in support of Jeff Perry for representative for the Fifth Barnstable District. Jeff is one of those once-in-a-lifetime politicians who does what he says and says what he means. He is a straight shooter who gives you his philosophy of government through mailings, cable, newspaper op-eds, and Internet. He leaves the philosophy for all to read, he explains it for all to understand, and lastly, he follows through with it to the benefit of the entire district, as well as the rest of the Cape.
If I could sum up Jeff Perry with one word, it would be integrity. He is always consistent in his actions, methods, values, measures, and principles. His value system is put out for all to see and is obvious to all in his actions. He considers himself fortunate to serve us all. He always listens to what folks have to say and provides them with first-class service when they are having a problem with government. His cable show is an outstanding service that gives insight to how state and local government works.
Despite being only one of a small number of Republicans in our General Court, because of his great strength in working with others, many of whom are Democrats, he has been able to get increased state aid for the district, and get beneficial programs paid for, programs that benefit the district.
Whether working with Democrats Cleon Turner on the Broadband Bill or Robert O’Leary on the Environmental Bond bill that will bring many dollars for wastewater system installation at no interest, or working with Democratic Senate President Therese Murray on the fire station at the base, the flyover legislation, or legislation to get $600,000 in matching funds to preserve Sandy Neck, Jeff has shown his ability to get state monies for the district and to work so well with others, even those who do not share his philosophy.
A vote for Jeff Perry is a vote for integrity, consistency of action, values, methods, and principles. Go out and vote and vote for Jeff.

Daniel N. DiGiandomenico
Buxus Shores Circle
Sandwich

Perry More Than An ‘R’

While the race for President dominates the discussion of the upcoming election, there is also an important race for the office of state representative here in the Fifth Barnstable district. While too many folks vote for the (D) or (R) next to the name, and not for the person, I’d like to share some of the other meanings of the (R) next to our State Representative Jeffrey Perry’s name.
For Representative Perry, the R stands for respect. He has earned the respect of people from both sides of the aisle on Beacon Hill and in his district. He has earned this respect by standing up for what he believes in, even if he is the lone voice. He has earned respect by tirelessly responding to his constituents by answering their questions, holding open office hours, and responding to their needs. Lastly, he has campaigned in a most respectful manner by refusing to be negative toward his opponent.
The R also stands for responsible. While so many in our state Legislature spend your money as if they found it in a brown paper bag on a street corner, Representative Perry understands how hard you work for that money. He also understands how you need more of your money now than ever before. That is why he has consistently and repsonsibly voted against budgets that overspend those dollars and has fought vigorously to respect our vote to keep more of our tax dollars.
Lastly, the R stands for re-elect. Representative Perry is one of the few checks and balances we have left in our State House. He is a voice of reason in a group that too frequently lacks reason. He is a determined opponent of the current education funding formula that punishes our community. He has successfully fought for stricter penalties for drunk drivers and child predators. Representative Jeffrey Perry, an R that needs to remain in legislature.

Rich Longueil
11 Cardinal Rd Sandwich

Perry Is ‘Best Overall’

Many years ago when I decided to vote for a candidate, I chose several qualities to base my judgment on. I wanted some one who was honest, had a definitive view as to what is truthful and what is not. I wanted a person who had enough experience to use common sense when making legislative decisions and at the same time was their own person. I voted for the person who, in my opinion, worked issues from a practical viewpoint and affordability.
It goes without saying that many decisions a representative will make, in the end, simply will not get done because that is life in a political world. Those who say that the other candidate can bring more financial assistance to Sandwich in today’s climate are simply, in my opinion, blowing a bunch of hot air.
Mr. Perry has brought to his district every dime that he could find among all the bills, while maintaining his integrity at the same time.
I was also looking for a leader who had principles and ethics. Mr. Perry has shown his leadership skills since he has been our representative and no one can deny that he has proven to be a worthy representative of his district in a world where most just go along to get along. Can that be said about Mr. Paré?
You must ask yourself if the opponent’s experience is so great with financial issues, how did our town get into such a predicament with its structural deficit since he has been a member of the finance committee?
Mr. Perry has obtained his law degree, and this shows me that he is a determined man. It has also placed him on another level of expertise. Understanding the intent of the laws can only help Mr. Perry better serve his district and the folks who need all the help they can get. Knowledge is the magic key to unlocking a system that only leaders can engage in and we have a leader in Mr. Perry. He faces the challenges with respect and honesty.
I ask you: do you want a person who provides programs that further increase the structural deficit of Sandwich and puts things in place that are unaffordable long term just to follow along to get along, or do you want a person who analyses the needs with affordability and integrity and with the expertise to do the right thing for his district?
We all have a choice to make come Election Day and the choice we make will no doubt affect how Sandwich goes forward in a very disturbing financial climate. If any magic bullet can be found to better assist our town and the entire district, it will be Mr. Perry. We should vote for the person who at present has the best overall record of financial abilities and that in my opinion is Mr. Perry.

Carl A. Johansen
Oxford Road
Sandwich

Vote For Perry ‘Win-win’

In these days of smear politics and do-nothing politicians, it is truly encouraging to have someone representing us on Beacon Hill with the character and fortitude of Jeff Perry. On November 4, I will be voting for Democrats in most offices, but will once again vote for a Republican for state representative.
For me, it is who the person is that matters. Not the party affiliation. Jeff is a man of great character who works incredibly hard for his constituents, regardless of party affiliation.
I have worked closely with Jeff on issues ranging from a new youth and community center in Barnstable, to saving the old grass airfield in Marstons Mills, to myriad issues related to the education of our children.
In every instance, Jeff has gone to bat for the people of his community. I have watched him work hard and build coalitions on both sides of the aisle. He has forged bonds with many of his Democratic colleagues in the House and is widely respected by constituents of all political persuasion.
My family goes back many generations in Sandwich, and I grew up in Marstons Mills. My great-great grandfather owned a tin shop on Russell’s Corner in Sandwich. Back in his day, a man’s word was his bond and the true measure of a man was his character and how he treated his family and the folks in his community. He would have liked Jeff very much.
Party politics has targeted Jeff’s seat and want him out because his party affiliation differs from 90 percent of the folks in the State House. That is just plain wrong. My great-grandfather would have thought that kind of partisanship was pretty darned foolish. So do I.
On November 4, I urge the voters in Sandwich, Barnstable, Bourne, and Mashpee who are well represented by Jeff Perry to just say “no” to party politics and send a good man back to the Hill.
When you compare the accomplishments of Jeff to his party politics opponent, there is no comparison. Jeff wins hands down.
When you compare the character of Jeff to his party politics opponent, there is no comparison. Jeff wins hands down.
It’s nice to have a win-win situation in these gloomy economic times.

Dave Chase
Marstons Mills

Perry Has Served Us Well

People will be heading to the polls on Election Day to cast their vote for President. Don’t stop there as we have several other important races on the ballot. For those who don’t follow state politics closely, I ask you to do your homework as we on the Upper Cape are already extremely fortunate to have one of the hardest-working representatives I have ever observed.
Representative Jeff Perry has served us well these last six years and has earned another term. He has been a leader in increasing state aid for our roads, schools, fire, and police. At the same time, Jeff Perry has stood up to the culture of backroom deals on Beacon Hill and exposed many corrupt things government has attempted to do. In this challenging time when government reform and change is needed more than ever, fortunately we already have the right person for the job. I hope you will join me in voting to reelect Representative Jeffrey Davis Perry. He is a man of honor and integrity and he has earned our respect and our vote.

Kay Merrell
Faunce Mountain Road
Sandwich

An ‘Advocate’ For Cape Codders

I write today to encourage the voters of the Fifth Barnstable District to reelect State Representative Jeffrey D. Perry (R - Sandwich) to the House of Representatives. It has been an honor to serve with Rep. Perry side by side in the Legislature for the past six years. Working with him in the Cape Delegation, I have seen his commitment to issues which uniquely affect citizens of Cape Cod.
As a member of the Homeowners Insurance Commission established last year, I know that ever-climbing rates and loss of insurance is an issue near and dear to Cape residents. Rep. Perry is committed to reestablishing consumer choice in the homeowner’s insurance market in order to help alleviate the pressure on homeowners.
I also personally noted Rep. Perry’s commitment to Cape residents during the planning and construction of the Sagamore flyover. He acted as an advocate for Cape residents to ensure this critical transportation need was met with minimal disruptions of daily life.
Jeff truly has the best interest of his constituents at heart.

Susan Williams Gifford
State Representative
2nd Plymouth District

Compare Perry And Paré

We would like to express our appreciation for the honorable manner in which Jeff Perry has served our community. Since moving to Sandwich 10 years ago, we have had many opportunities to observe Jeff’s commitment to the Upper Cape. His fiscal concern for both state and local taxpayers has been repeatedly demonstrated. His support and sponsorship of several beneficial laws, including Melanie’s Law and Jessica’s Law, reflect his strong personal values and concern for the Massachusetts citizens.
Jeff Perry has a large bi-partisan support base and has proven time and again over the past six years that he is the right man for the job. It is our sincere hope that Upper Cape residents will be fortunate to have him represent them for many years to come!
Before casting your vote, we ask that you give serious consideration to the qualifications of both candidates. Visit their respective websites to check out their accomplishments. Make an effort to speak to those in town who know them or who have had dealings with them in the past. We believe it will soon be quite evident to you that there is, indeed, “a world of difference” between Jeff Perry and Glenn Paré.

Don J. and Judith Stainbrook
Faunce Mountain Road
Sandwich

Perry Addresses Power Plant

The Mirant power plant and its conversion to natural gas has been in the news recently. I want to thank our state representative, Jeff Perry, for his thoughtful approach on this issue. After hearing him speak about this issue at a forum he held, I appreciate his efforts to bring a cleaner-burning, more efficient fuel to the plant. Many people probably are not aware that he sponsored the legislation to increase the supply of natural gas to Cape Cod.
Representative Perry understands the economic and environmental issues surrounding the power plant. He takes a balanced and positive approach to reaching a solution that provides reliable power, improves air quality, and increases tax revenue from the plant. Unfortunately, some of our other elected officials simply want to grab headlines, but offer no real solutions. Perry is a responsive and involved legislator, a leader with a record of accomplishments during his time in office, and has proven his worth time and time again for the Upper Cape.
This issue is just one of the many reasons why I support the work of Jeff Perry. I am proud to display a red Perry sign on my front lawn and will vote for his reelection on November 4.

Nancy Sandborg
Liberty Street
Sandwich

Effective Cross ‘Party Lines’

I am supporting Representative Jeffrey D. Perry’s reelection bid to the House of Representatives for many reasons. A recent example of why is the manner in which Perry worked effectively across political party lines on the “OpenCape initiative.”
The Open Cape initiative is led by the OpenCape Corporation, a nonprofit organization, a regionwide collaborative led by Cape Cod Community College, the Cape Cod Technology Council, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), and the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth. The collaboration involves more than 40 different regional entities, including school districts, municipalities, and other agencies in support of the mission to create a regional wireless communications network that provides reliable, redundant, and secure backhaul communications for public and commercial access networks on Cape Cod and the Islands. Arguably, the manifestation of OpenCape will be the catalyst that will accelerate desired and sustainable economic development for many generations to come.
Representative Perry developed and implemented an action plan to energize his fellow Cape region legislators’ support and involvement that culminated with the bill being passed and signed by the governor. Leadership comes in many forms. The form and style exhibited and executed by Mr. Perry on behalf of the OpenCape initiative is representative of my expectation of those elected to represent our interests. Accordingly, when I go the polls on November 4, I will be voting for State Representative Jeffrey Davis Perry, a leader who has earned another term in office. I hope you’ll support his reelection, too.

John D. Harris
Bourne Hay Road
Sandwich

Supports Perry’s Candidacy

Please take the time on November 4 to vote to reelect our state Representative Jeffrey D. Perry; don’t confuse the name with Glenn Paré (Jeff’s opponent!)
Five years ago, our family kept noticing these large groups of people holding Perry signs and after a while wondered who is this guy who is polarizing these people. Jeff was also crucial in fighting for my husband after he suffered a lifelong brain injury from being rear-ended at 75 mph by an unlicensed, uninsured illegal immigrant.
I have watched Representative Perry’s relentless work and endless courage to go against the “go along to get along Beacon Hill crowd,” who are not working in our best interests.
Being a state worker for more than 22 years, I can assure you that the blatant abuses of your tax dollars is rampant, and it will not change until you vote in more people like Jeff Perry.
Jeff’s accomplishments and ability to stand his ground while the Democratically controlled house is up against him is truly admirable and courageous. When it was needed, he took his fights to the airwaves of the radio and the newspapers, which have been very effective in educating the public and embarrassing the other representatives into doing the right thing for the taxpayers. He was instrumental in exposing the Democratic plans to give illegal immigrants free college tuition, was just one of many battles he fought against and won. Melanie’s Law was also a long-fought battle he won for the citizens against repeat drunk drivers.
Trust us, the list of accomplishments are endless, along with Jeff’s compassion and energy to work hard every day for us little people. Jeff never forgets that he represents all of us every day on Beacon Hill. Jeff’s a true political fighter for all the issues affecting his constituents.

Trish Lubold & Family
Chapaquoit Way
Sandwich

‘Body Blow’ To Economy

I hope other residents will join me in voting “no” on Question 1, the ballot initiative to repeal the state income tax. This measure would slash state revenues by more than $12 billion, wiping out nearly 40 percent of the state budget. Since many budget items are legally protected and cannot be cut, state aid to public schools and other local services would have to be cut deeply to balance the state budget.
Here’s how the business-backed Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation described what the organization calls the “enormous consequences” of Question 1:
“The large cuts in education and non-education aid would have a devastating impact on cities and towns that are already facing serious fiscal problems. The result would be major cuts in services in almost all communities and ever higher property taxes that would fall more heavily on low and moderate income taxpayers.”
Question 1 is a lose-lose-lose proposition. We’d lose very important—vital— school, municipal, and state services. We’d end up paying higher property taxes and fees. And our economy would take a body blow—damage to the infrastructure and quality of the workforce—in the middle of a recession.
Some people may be tempted to vote for Question 1 to “send a message” to Beacon Hill. Unfortunately, a message in the form of a binding ballot initiative to eliminate the income tax would boomerang back and hit us all in the face because the quality of life for everyone in our community would suffer.

Ernest G. Holcomb
President
Falmouth Educators
Association